Basic Attention DCA Backtest
Daily-close data from 4 March 2019 to 12 October 2026 (91 months). Last updated 12 October 2026.
Quick answer
Basic Attention DCA Backtest — $100/month in BAT since 2019 — $9,200 invested, now $6,736 (-27%)
As of 12 October 2026 · Source: BATUSDT daily closes (Binance)
At the current exchange rate, $100 ≈ ₹9,656 — totals below are USD-denominated so the historical math stays exact.
Total invested
$9,200
Value today
$6,736
Total return
-27%
Annualized (on contributions)
-4.0%
Monthly buys
92
Average buy price
$100.00
| Price | |
|---|---|
| Cheapest buy | $0.0653 |
| Most expensive buy | $1.49 |
About this metric
Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) invests a fixed amount on a fixed schedule regardless of price, removing the stress of timing entries. This simulation buys at the first daily close of every month and values the position at the latest close. It ignores trading fees and taxes, and past performance — especially in an asset with this volatility — does not predict future results.
Methodology
- Data: daily closes from the BATUSDT market on Binance (public REST API).
- Window: 4 March 2019 — 12 October 2026; pages recompute at most every 6 hours.
- All figures are calculated by CoinCrypTick from that raw data — nothing is quoted from third parties.
- Not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile; read the drawdown page before the returns page.
Track BAT in your dashboard
Free account — alerts, portfolio tracking and historical analytics on this coin and 200+ more.
Frequently asked questions
What if I invested $100 in BAT every month?
Since 4 March 2019, that plan would have invested $9,200 across 92 monthly buys and would be worth $6,736 today — -27% overall.
What average price did a monthly DCA get in BAT?
The simulation's average buy price is $100.00, versus the current price of $0.15.
Does DCA beat lump-sum investing in BAT?
That depends entirely on the entry date — the whole point of DCA is that you don't have to guess. This page shows the mechanical outcome of steady monthly buying; compare it with the yearly returns table to see how lumpy the alternative would have been.