Arbitrum DCA Backtest
Daily-close data from 23 March 2023 to 12 October 2026 (43 months). Last updated 12 October 2026.
Quick answer
Arbitrum DCA Backtest — $100/month in ARB since 2023 — $4,400 invested, now $2,743 (-38%)
As of 12 October 2026 · Source: ARBUSDT daily closes (Binance)
At the current exchange rate, $100 ≈ ₹9,574 — totals below are USD-denominated so the historical math stays exact.
Total invested
$4,400
Value today
$2,743
Total return
-38%
Annualized (on contributions)
-12.1%
Monthly buys
44
Average buy price
$100.00
| Price | |
|---|---|
| Cheapest buy | $0.0768 |
| Most expensive buy | $1.99 |
About this metric
Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) invests a fixed amount on a fixed schedule regardless of price, removing the stress of timing entries. This simulation buys at the first daily close of every month and values the position at the latest close. It ignores trading fees and taxes, and past performance — especially in an asset with this volatility — does not predict future results.
Methodology
- Data: daily closes from the ARBUSDT market on Binance (public REST API).
- Window: 23 March 2023 — 12 October 2026; pages recompute at most every 6 hours.
- All figures are calculated by CoinCrypTick from that raw data — nothing is quoted from third parties.
- Not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile; read the drawdown page before the returns page.
Track ARB in your dashboard
Free account — alerts, portfolio tracking and historical analytics on this coin and 200+ more.
Frequently asked questions
What if I invested $100 in ARB every month?
Since 23 March 2023, that plan would have invested $4,400 across 44 monthly buys and would be worth $2,743 today — -38% overall.
What average price did a monthly DCA get in ARB?
The simulation's average buy price is $100.00, versus the current price of $0.19.
Does DCA beat lump-sum investing in ARB?
That depends entirely on the entry date — the whole point of DCA is that you don't have to guess. This page shows the mechanical outcome of steady monthly buying; compare it with the yearly returns table to see how lumpy the alternative would have been.